The President of Pakistan Mr. Asif Ali Zardari had referred the controversial ‘Peace Deal’ to the Parliament of the country through his powerless Prime Minister. The tactic was initially thought to have been a political delay in signing the deal. However, the Parliament unanimously adopted the deal put forth by the country’s Prime Minister. It was later signed by the President before he left for a private two-day visit to Dubai.
The ‘Peace Deal’ was earlier signed between the provincial government and the notorious Tehrik-e-Taliban Pakistan (TTP) swat chapter led by the cleric Maulana Fazl-ullah. The deal had brought a loud international outcry and sharp criticisms. In the international community it was understood as an effective surrender to the Taliban rule. Most called it the provision of a ‘Safe Heaven’ for Taliban and its Terrorist allies to legally use Pakistani soils to launch attacks in the region and as far as the United States. The Federal Pakistani government, led by the widower of deceased Pakistani Prime Minister Benazir Bhutto and her Party Pakistan Peoples Party, was under mounting pressure to remain at bay from signing such a deal that allows such a group to openly operate inside Pakistani soil. However, after a couple of months of delay and extra-pressure from the provincial government, it was referred to the National Assembly of the Nation and the ‘Deal’ cleared its way after a short debate over its implications as according to the law makers it was more important to bring a durable peace in the restive Swat Valley, which is known as Asia’s Switzerland for it magnificent natural beauty and tourism attraction.
The deal carries at least two implications. First, it is hoped that peace will return to the valley and the local residents may start up doing their business in calm after two years of unrest. The valley will once again enjoy peace and attract tourists. Secondly, with the implementation of the deal in its true spirit, movement will be restricted since it will be a Taliban model Islamic law which will not allow the sale of liquor, the free movement of women, ban on western dress, growing beard for men and wearing of burqa by women etc.
In such a scenario, it’s high time for the government to go with the disarmament process first and foremost. This is also in doubt as it will determine government’s will and writ in this affair. Secondly, the government will have to make sure that like the rest of Pakistan, it will be an area where the constitution of Pakistan is promulgated and not a constitution made and announced by Taliban over radio. Pakistani government further bears the responsibility for sorting out all types of judiciary affairs. The culprits of any crime should be brought to justice by the government agencies and institutions and not by Taliban to flog certain man or woman. The challenges have now started to come up on the government to make sure everything goes as it wills and not as Taliban will.
With the passing of the bill there were great outcries of celebrations amongst the Pro-Taliban religious political parties and the provincial government as well as the opposition parties. However, for the PPP government it was another hard morsel to be digested in the wake of huge international pressure. Now, the eyes are fixed on what this deal will bring? Will we witness real peace as claimed by the stakeholders of the deal? Or will we see another military operation in the valley? Time shall remain a deciding factor in all
You are right in stating that Islam isn’t the property of an individual to exploit it the way he wants. But it’s also true that the Muslim Majority usually chooses to remain silent and let them act the way it pleases those fanatic few.
Muslim extremists are no doubt a trouble for the rest of the world but the biggest problem is that even the Muslim moderates do not oppose them strongly, which gives them the indirect support from the rest of the community. I think the moderates can’t stay neutral any more. Either oppose terrorism else it means you support it. There should not be a grey area in this matter.
i feel sayin' that taliban lives in public. had they been living away without public support, don't you think they would have been destroyed so far.
I agree one 100 individuals can not fight against taliban but how about the army and ppl not supporting anything for Taliban. But for that you need the will and Pakistan is a country that has always provided safe heaven to the terrorists. And now signing the deal, zardari has legalized the terrorism in Pakistan. What else you can expect from Pakistan and its leaders who have sponsored them in the past.
I think majority of the conflicts have their origin in religion. So we need to discard the religion.
Agree with u...
Local Opinions (5)
i dont understand how can unlawful enforcement and a getup be given the name of islam???????
islam is neither a personal property of anyone nor is it answering a person for ur deeds, its between God and an individual. isnt it?????????????
You are right in stating that Islam isn’t the property of an individual to exploit it the way he wants. But it’s also true that the Muslim Majority usually chooses to remain silent and let them act the way it pleases those fanatic few.
Global Opinions (15)
Muslim extremists are no doubt a trouble for the rest of the world but the biggest problem is that even the Muslim moderates do not oppose them strongly, which gives them the indirect support from the rest of the community. I think the moderates can’t stay neutral any more. Either oppose terrorism else it means you support it. There should not be a grey area in this matter.
there is even no denying the fact that taliban has ppl's support and that makes them unknown enemy for the army to wipe out.
and the last thing I wanna say is you vote for the present Govt now why make hue and cry? you ppl are on fault. stop blaming govt. coz govt. is what you ppl are. isn't it???
i feel sayin' that taliban lives in public. had they been living away without public support, don't you think they would have been destroyed so far.
I agree one 100 individuals can not fight against taliban but how about the army and ppl not supporting anything for Taliban. But for that you need the will and Pakistan is a country that has always provided safe heaven to the terrorists. And now signing the deal, zardari has legalized the terrorism in Pakistan. What else you can expect from Pakistan and its leaders who have sponsored them in the past.
I think majority of the conflicts have their origin in religion. So we need to discard the religion.
Home

Delicious
Digg
Facebook
Reddit
Stumble Upon
Technorati
Mixx
Sphinn
Twitter
SphereIt
Propeller
Gmarks
Newsvine
Yahoo! My Web
Live Journal
Blinklist
E-mail
RSS 













i dont understand how can unlawful enforcement and a getup be given the name of islam???????
islam is neither a personal property of anyone nor is it answering a person for ur deeds, its between God and an individual. isnt it?????????????
there is even no denying the fact that taliban has ppl's support and that makes them unknown enemy for the army to wipe out.
and the last thing I wanna say is you vote for the present Govt now why make hue and cry? you ppl are on fault. stop blaming govt. coz govt. is what you ppl are. isn't it???